USGS Releases Latest Estimates of Water Use in the United States

Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2005
Author: Bevan Griffiths-Sattenspiel

The USGS has FINALLY released it's latest estimates of water use in the United States. The results come from their 2005 assessment and provide the best available quantification of water use across the country.

Every five years the USGS publishes state by state water withdrawal data in their "Estimated Water Use in the United States series". As far as I can tell, this is the only assessment of its kind in the U.S., and for water geeks like me it provides the most authoritative information on water use and trends across the country. Until now, the most recent data was from the USGS' estimate of water use in 2001.

I probably won't read the report until I have research that depends on it, but I did browse the fact sheet to get a general overview of the findings. Water use information is broken down by state so you can download your state's water data if you aren't interested in national figures.

What I found most interesting was that overall water use from 2000 to 2005 declined by less than 1% (conservation and efficiency works!), while water use for thermoelectric power generation increased by about 3%. Here's an abstract of the report's findings:

Estimates of water use in the United States indicate that about 410 billion gallons per day (Bgal/d) were withdrawn in 2005 for all categories summarized in this report. This total is slightly less than the estimate for 2000, and about 5 percent less than total withdrawals in the peak year of 1980. Freshwater withdrawals in 2005 were 349 Bgal/d, or 85 percent of the total freshwater and saline-water withdrawals. Fresh groundwater withdrawals of 79.6 Bgal/day in 2005 were about 5 percent less than in 2000, and fresh surface-water withdrawals of 270 Bgal/day were about the same as in 2000. Withdrawals for thermoelectric-power generation and irrigation, the two largest uses of water, have stabilized or decreased since 1980. Withdrawals for public-supply and domestic uses have increased steadily since estimates began.

Thermoelectric-power generation water withdrawals were an estimated 201 Bgal/d in 2005, about 3 percent more than in 2000. In 2005, thermoelectric freshwater withdrawals accounted for 41 percent of all freshwater withdrawals. Nearly all of the water withdrawn for thermoelectric power was surface water used for once-through cooling at power plants. Twenty-nine percent of thermoelectric-power withdrawals were saline water from oceans and brackish coastal water bodies.

Withdrawals for irrigation in 2005 were 128 Bgal/d, about 8 percent less than in 2000 and approximately equal to estimates of irrigation water use in 1970. In 2005, irrigation withdrawals accounted for 37 percent of all freshwater withdrawals and 62 percent of all freshwater withdrawals excluding thermoelectric withdrawals. Irrigated acreage increased from 25 million acres in 1950 to 58 million acres in 1980, then remained fairly constant before increasing in 2000 and 2005 to more than 60 million acres. The number of acres irrigated using sprinkler and microirrigation systems has continued to increase and in 2005 accounted for 56 percent of the total irrigated acreage.

Water withdrawals for public supply were 44.2 Bgal/d in 2005, which is 2 percent more than in 2000, although the population increased by more than 5 percent during that time. Public supply accounted for 13 percent of all freshwater withdrawals in 2005 and 21 percent of all freshwater withdrawals excluding thermoelectric withdrawals. The percentage of the U.S. population obtaining drinking water from public suppliers has increased steadily from 62 percent in 1950 to 86 percent in 2005. Most of the population providing their own household water obtained their supplies from groundwater sources.

Self-supplied industrial water withdrawals continued to decline in 2005, as they have since their peak in 1970. Self-supplied industrial withdrawals were an estimated 18.2 Bgal/d in 2005, a 30-percent decrease from 1985. An estimated 4.02 Bgal/d were withdrawn for mining in 2005, which is 11 percent less than in 2000, and 18 percent less than in 1990. Withdrawals for mining were only 58 percent freshwater.

Livestock water use was estimated to be 2.14 Bgal/d in 2005, which is the smallest estimate since 1975, possibly due to the use of standardized coefficients for estimation of animal water needs. Water use for aquaculture was an estimated 8.78 Bgal/d in 2005, nearly four times the amount estimated in 1985. Part of this increase is due to the inclusion of more facilities in the estimates in 2005, and the use of standardized coefficients for estimating aquaculture use from other data.

Fresh surface water was the source for a majority of the public-supply, irrigation, aquaculture, thermoelectric, and industrial withdrawals. Nearly 30 percent of all fresh surface-water withdrawals in 2005 occurred in five States. In California, Idaho, and Colorado, most of the fresh surface-water withdrawals were for irrigation. In Texas and Illinois, most of the fresh surface-water withdrawals were for thermoelectric power generation.

About 67 percent of fresh groundwater withdrawals in 2005 were for irrigation, and 18 percent were for public supply. More than half of fresh groundwater withdrawals in the United States in 2005 occurred in six States. In California, Texas, Nebraska, Arkansas, and Idaho, most of the fresh groundwater withdrawals were for irrigation. In Florida, 52 percent of all fresh groundwater withdrawals were for public supply, and 34 percent were for irrigation.

Download the full report: Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2005

Are we running out of water?

So this new data from USGS looks like all is good in the water world - except!! The way "water use" is measured does not truly capture what is going on in the water cycle. The numbers are not necessarily comparable from state to state. It doesn't include many things that contribute to significant loss of ground water and soil moisture such as water that hits the pavement in our cities and is shunted uselessly to mega-sewers (where it can cause sewage overflows and pollution). Our figures are mostly based on diversion rates (ground water pumping and surface water diversion canals/pumps) in state where there are water rights. It does not include water consumed by non-irrigated crops for agriculture or bio-fuels. Thanks Bevan, for pulling this together for us -- the USGS numbers are crucial to understanding what is going on -- but they don't tell the whole story.

RE: Are we running out of water?

Thanks for making these great points! I couldn't agree with you more that the USGS water use figures only capture a small part of the picture and fail to consider a whole lot of other important factors, as you mention. I'm also really glad you brought up the point that the state by state data is not necessarily consistent since states employ different methodologies - with varying levels of quality - to collect information on their water use. I guess the bottom line is that while the USGS estimate might be the best available analysis of water use in the U.S., it is very far from complete. Given our current and looming water challenges, we need to get more serious about understanding the condition of our water resources and one of the first places to start is collecting more robust, standardized data that takes into account a variety human impacts on water.

Post new comment

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.