The Saving Water, Saving Energy blog provides the latest news, resources and analysis on water, energy, and climate change issues with an emphasis on the inextricable connections between water and energy, also know as the Water-Energy Nexus.
The SWSE blog is produced by Travis Leipzig, River Network's Rivers, Energy & Climate Program Coordinator.
Contact Travis directly with questions, comments or new information to share!
Click below to view blogs updated by the River Network staff.
Our Partners are some of the smartest, wittiest and most interesting people we know...and we're not just saying that. Check out what some of them have to say via their blogs.
Pennsylvania is one of the largest coal producing states in the country, with more than 250 mines churning out 65,414,000 short tons of coal per year, or more than 130 billion pounds of the country’s dirtiest source of energy. A report sponsored by the Citizens Coal Council and released last month provides an in-depth look at regulatory practices in Pennsylvania and finds that laws protecting water supplies from underground coal mining, specifically longwall mining, are inadequate and/or poorly enforced.
Here’s a brief summary from a press release from the Pennsylvania Chapter of the Sierra Club:
NEW SCIENTIFIC REPORT: “PROTECTION OF WATER RESOURCES FROM LONGWALL COAL MINING IS NEEDED IN PENNSYLVANIA”
Report Cites Administrative Quagmire of Illogical Permit Monitoring, Baseless Decisions, and Lax Oversight of Coal Mining Companies by PA DEP
(Harrisburg, PA) – The Pennsylvania Chapter of the Sierra Club today joins the Citizens Coal Council, a national non-profit organization based in Washington, PA, in announcing the release of a new scientific report by the ecological consulting firm, Schmid and Company, Inc. of Media, PA: “Protection of Water Resources from Longwall Coal Mining is Needed in Southwestern Pennsylvania.”
The Citizens Coal Council’s report documents an internal administrative quagmire of illogical permit monitoring, baseless decisions, and lax oversight of coal operators by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). CCC’s report was made possible by Sierra Club grants from the Pennsylvania Chapter’s Bernheim Grant Fund and the Allegheny Group’s Huplits Wildlife Grant Fund.
Key among the report’s findings is that despite improved data collection requirements and strong state constitutional and regulatory safeguards, the PADEP has failed to adequately evaluate and protect against threats to valuable Pennsylvania streams and watersheds adversely affected by the longwall “full extraction” method of coal mining. As a result, exceptional value and high quality streams are being lost to longwall mining.
“This is an outstanding report, and we look forward to the Governor and the Environmental Quality Board responding with the appropriate changes to the DEP’s organizational structure which has sheltered the Mining Bureau from proper oversight,” said Tom Au, Chair of the Conservation Committee of the Pennsylvania Chapter of the Sierra Club.
Download: Protection of Water Resources from Longwall Mining is Needed in Southwestern Pennsylvania (PDF)
Disclosure: This report was forwarded to me by one of its authors, Steve Kunz, Senior Ecologist at Schmid & Company, Inc.
For more info on longwall coal mining
Thanks for posting this, Bevan!
Folks, for more on longwall coal mining (which produces twice as much coal as mountaintop removal mining in the U.S.) see also:
"Subsided Ground… Fallen Futures" by Terri Taylor
A documentary about longwall coal mining in Pennsylvania
http://www.citizenscoalcouncil.org/blog/
AND
LONGWALL MINING: THE COAL INDUSTRY’S BEST KEPT SECRET
http://www.citizenscoalcouncil.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=art...
AND
THE HIDDEN COSTS OF ”CLEAN COAL"
http://www.publicintegrity.org/news/entry/1113/
"Center Exposes Environmental Consequences of Longwall Coal Mining - 'Clean Coal' Legacy of Pollution Starts Even Before it’s Burned" --
WASHINGTON, D.C., January 12, 2009 — Longwall mining is a highly productive underground process employed to quickly and cheaply extract coal, but the practice comes with a steep environmental price, as documented in a year-long investigation by the Center for Public Integrity, The Hidden Costs of “Clean Coal." As Congress and the incoming Obama administration contemplate alternatives to fossil fuels, the Center has turned a spotlight on a devastating mining method that most Americans outside northern Appalachia have never heard of.
Longwall mines produced 176 million tons of coal in 2007 — 15 percent of total U.S. production, according to the federal Energy Information Administration. An estimated 10 percent of all U.S. electricity now depends on coal from longwall mining, which has grown over the years in Appalachia and in the states of Illinois, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico.
The Center’s newly released project, The Hidden Costs of “Clean Coal, features a multimedia website with two magazine articles (“The Big Seep” and “Undermined”) a narrated video, a podcast, a document library, and a slideshow which offers a rare glimpse inside one of the country’s largest longwall mines.
“The environment and residents along the Appalachian corridor are suffering the consequences of longwall mining’s extraction methods,” said Center Executive Director Bill Buzenberg. “Weak government oversight has failed to account for the damage done and has left citizens virtually powerless to undo the harm.”
Concentrated primarily in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern Appalachia, longwall mining dramatically rearranges the earth’s landscape. The process involves hulking steel shearers that wind their way beneath landowners’ homes, slicing off entire coal seams hundreds of feet below ground and leaving in its wake caverns up to five feet tall. The consequent shock waves cause severe damage to structures, deplete water resources, and disrupt wildlife.
The Center’s first story, “Undermined,” exposes the David-versus-Goliath battles that
have defined southwestern Pennsylvania, where six of the country’s top 25 longwall mines snake below 138,743 acres of rural terrain — 15 percent of the region. The piece underscores the difficult and prolonged battle that landowners face, fighting not only “Big Coal,” with its legal tactics and political sway, but indifferent state officials. By September 2008, 1,819 Pennsylvania property owners had reported longwall damages since the state began documenting such complaints.
The second article, “The Big Seep,” examines longwall mining’s crippling
environmental legacy: dried up streams. Scientists have found that the impact of longwall mining has permanently lowered the region’s water table, while farmers have been hit hard by disappearing agricultural land. In 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service found in field investigations that out of 131 tributaries undermined by the longwall machine, more than half had either been drained or damned up.
While longwall mining continues unabated, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection has failed to document the extensive structural damages to homes and vanishing water sources, the investigation found. While the DEP is required by law to assess the mining’s damages every five years, past agency studies have been criticized for their lack of data.
Michael Nixon
for Citizens Coal Council
Thanks for all the great info
Thanks for all the great info Mike!
Funding
As a watershed professional in PA, a government one at that, I feel I should let you now that state funding will be a driving force in any changes to DEP oversight. Take a look at how their budget has taken a major hit the past few years. Their budget is now about what it was in the mid 90's! Good luck trying to actually preform the protection mandates huh. Just something to keep in mind.
You bring up a great point
You bring up a great point about state funding, or lack thereof. It certainly is a travesty that in many states the budgets for regulatory agencies shrink while the industries they are supposed to regulate expand.
While it is easy for people to read a report such as this and get the impression that the lack of enforcement is because regulatory agencies are "in-bed" with industry (as was the case with Federal regulators in the old Minerals Management Service) the sad and much less exciting truth is that many state agencies, especially now with the recent recession, just don't have the staff or the funding to do the job they are supposed to do. My experience has shown that in most cases, the people working for state regulatory agencies are just as passionate about protecting the environment as those working in nonprofits. Now I'm not denying that corruption exists, but I do believe that the vast majority of employees for state environmental agencies really do believe in what they are doing and want to protect our natural resources. But as anybody in the nonprofit world knows, funding is often the constraining factor to getting a job done well.
I think the authors of this study did a great job clearly and meticulously documenting the consequences of coal mining in Pennsylvania and the lack of oversight but they are missing an important message about funding. If, as this commenter suggests, the budget for the DEP is the same now as it was in the 90's then the people should be advocating as strongly for increased funding as they should for stricter regulations. After all, the law cannot persuade where it cannot punish and without adequate funding for enforcement the coal industry will continue ignoring regulations
Post new comment